HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ON RACISM

PROPHET HUMAN CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVE CONTACTS INFORMATION THAT IS SENT TO ALL MY CONTACTS HUMAN, CIVIL RIGHTS, EMBASSIES, NEWS REPORTERS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS NAACP INFORMATION ON TAKING ACTION AND ISSUES THE LATEST REAL BLOG THE LATEST REAL BLOG TWO MY SHARED FILES PHOTOS Sentencing: US Prison Population Medical Marijuana: Michigan Initiative Organizers Hand in Half a Million Signatures THE VIOLENCE OF THE ILLEGAL DRUG WAR AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL ON RACIAL PROFILING TOLERANCE ON HATE CRIMES HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ON RACISM CANCER CURE HEMP LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PROHIBITION AND U.S. PRISON EMPIRE SENTENCING LAW AND POLICY THE SPREAD OF RACIAL INSULTS AND PROFILING BY H.J. ANSLINGER INMATE RELEASE PLAN MAY MAKE GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER "LAST PRISON HERO" What's New Custom Rich-Text Page



African American Profile Graphics SoulCityGraphics.com
Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
hitupmyspot.com
The World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, was held in Durban, South Africa from August 31 to September 7, 2001.

 
 
 
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/race/index.htm


Joint Statement to the OSCE Conference on Anti-Semitism
Berlin, April 28-29, 2004
Overview of Developments in 2001
from the Human Rights Watch 2002 World Report, January 16, 2002
Anti-Racism Summit Ends on Hopeful Note, Press release, September 10, 2001
India: Spotlight on Caste Discrimination, Press release, September 11, 2001

Overview:

Key issues:

Recent Press releases


Key Issues:

  • Discrimination by reason of caste

  • In much of Asia and parts of Africa racism has become coterminous with caste in the definition and exclusion of distinct population groups distinguished by their descent. Despite formal protections in law, discriminatory treatment remains endemic and discriminatory societal norms continue to be reinforced by government structures ranging from the police and the lower courts to state and municipal authorities. Express recognition is required that caste-based discrimination bars millions from the exercise of their civil and political, and their economic, social, and cultural rights — a precondition for international programs to support the abolition of caste discrimination and to remedy abuses.


  • Caste: Asia's Hidden Apartheid

  • HRW Press Kit

  • Draft Resolution on Discrimination Based on Work and Descent

  • May 12, 2001

  • Caste Discrimination: A Global Concern

  • HRW Report, August 29, 2001


  • End Global Caste Discrimination

  • Marking the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Human Rights Watch today called for an end to caste-based discrimination around the world.

  • Press Release, March 21, 2001

  • End Caste Discrimination

  • HRW Special Focus Page


  • Discrimination in the Determination of Nationality and Citizenship Rights

  • Millions of people have been denied or stripped of citizenship in their own countries solely because of their race, national descent, and gender. In many countries, children born in their mother’s country are denied her nationality because women can not transmit nationality. These citizens without citizenship are denied a broad range of civil and political, and economic, social and cultural rights.

  • ationality and Statelessness

  • HRW Press Kit
  • The Rights of Migrants, Refugees, and Asylum Seekers

  • Throughout the world, refugees, asylum seekers, migrants and internally displaced persons are the victims of racial discrimination, racist attacks, xenophobia and ethnic intolerance. Racism is both a cause and a product of forced displacement, and an obstacle to its solution. In 2000, some 150 million migrants were living outside their countries of birth. Of these, some 50 million people were forcibly displaced as a result of persecution, conflict, and human rights violations. Industrialized states have introduced a barrage of restrictive policies and practices over the past decade targeting asylum seekers, refugees, and migrants. Even traditionally generous host countries in the developing world, often over-burdened with their own social and economic problems, have become increasingly reluctant to host large refugee populations.

  • Press kit on refugees, migrants and racism

  • August 2001

  • Don't Drop Refugee Rights

  • September 1, 2001

  • To Help Refugees, Fight the Racism Behind Them

  • August 31, 2001


  • Protecting the Human Rights of Refugees, Asylum Seekers, Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons Suggested Language from Human Rights Watch

  • ( Download PDF Version, 21 Pages )

  • August 6, 2001


  • Racism and Refugees: HRW Contribution to the World Conference Against Racism

  • A Critique of Elements of the Draft Declaration and Programme of Action

  • May 2001


  • Racism, Refugees and Migrants: HRW Contribution to the European Conference Against Racism

  • October 2000


  • Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Internally Displaced Persons

  • HRW Special Focus Page

  • Discrimination in Criminal Justice

  • Criminal justice has an enormous potential for unjustified discriminatory effect. At the national or local level discrimination can arise from practices with racist intent, like racial profiling, in which an individual’s presumed race is the determining factor in placing them under suspicion. The mechanisms of criminal justice can equally result in unjustified discriminatory effect where there is no clear racist intent. Discriminatory impact can be shown in patterns of police abuse, arbitrary arrest, incarceration, prosecution, and sentencing. The de facto denial of remedies to particular groups within a criminal justice system or the disparate effect of de jure disenfranchisement of members of a particular group may be evidence of unjustified racial discrimination regardless of the intent of lawmakers and public officials.


  • Racism and the Administration of Justice

  • HRW Press Kit

  • Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs

  • HRW Report

  • Reparations for Slavery and Segregation

  • Groups that suffer today because of slavery or other severe racist practices should be compensated by governments responsible for these practices. Human Rights Watch is calling for the creation of national and international panels to identify and acknowledge past abuses and to guide action to counter their present-day effect. The panels should aim to reveal the extent to which a government’s past racist practices contribute to contemporary deprivation, domestically and abroad. Reparations for past abuse should focus first on groups that continue to suffer the most severe hardships. A primary purpose of reparations would be to address the social and economic foundations of today’s victims’ continuing marginalization—through means such as investment in education, housing, health care, or job training.


  • An Approach to Reparations

  • Human Rights Watch Position Paper

  • July 19, 2001


  • Reparations Urged for Slavery, Segregation

  • Press Release

  • July 19, 2001

  • Other Human Rights Watch contributions to the World Conference Against Racism fora:
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

    Anti-Racism Summit Ends on Hopeful Note

     

    http://hrw.org/english/docs/2001/09/10/global3038_txt.htm

     

    Progress Amid Controversy; Dalits Vow to Fight On

    (New York, September 10, 2001) -- Human Rights Watch said today that the key to ensuring that the World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) marked a step forward was ensuring that governments delivered on the anti-racism agenda adopted here.

    The WCAR often seemed dominated by acrimonious disputes over the Middle East, including a walk-out by the United States and Israel. But Human Rights Watch said that on many other issues, including the protection of migrants and refugees, repairing the legacy of slavery and equal nationality rights for women, critical progress was made. The United Nations will appoint a panel of five experts to review how countries carry out their commitments.  

     "If governments would really put in practice what they agreed to here, we could make real headway in combating racism," said Reed Brody, Advocacy Director of Human Rights Watch. "We're pleased that the conference gave the United Nations a strong role in making sure that the promises made in Durban don't die here." 
     
    The summit called for far-reaching programs to address intolerance and discrimination against the 150 million migrants in the world, including education campaigns and prevention of workplace bias. It asked countries to combat intolerance against refugees and to protect the more than 30 million people displaced in their own countries. It asked countries to monitor and ensure accountability for police misconduct and to eliminate "racial profiling." The conference called on countries to fund anti-racism efforts and public awareness campaigns in schools and the media. It urged governments to collect data disaggregated by race, which Human Rights Watch said was a first means of identifying and then addressing discrimination in health and the provision of government services. 

    The conference acknowledged that slavery and the slave trade "are a crime against humanity and should always have been so," and said that states had a "moral obligation" to "take appropriate and effective measures to halt and reverse the lasting consequences of those practices." "This is an historic recognition of the criminality of slavery and the moral obligation to repair its lasting damage," said Brody. 
     
    In a significant step, the conference asked countries to allow women the right, on an equal basis with men, to transmit their nationality to their children and spouses, a right denied in many countries, especially in the Middle East and North Africa. Moreover, the conference program of action acknowledges the multiple and unique ways in which racism and sexism interact to deny women their human rights, Human Rights Watch said. 

    Human Rights Watch noted that the summit, and the five regional meetings which preceded it, had galvanized tens of thousands of victims to voice their demands. 

    "A great achievement of this process has been the unprecedented mobilization of victims of racism from communities around the world, such as the so-called untouchables of South Asia, the Roma of Europe, and blacks in Latin America who have put their plights squarely on the international agenda," said Brody. 

    Furious lobbying by the Indian government led to a last-minute removal of references in the conference documents to discrimination based on "work and descent," a reference to the plight of the Dalits, the so-called untouchables. 

    "India has only fueled international scrutiny by fighting to keep caste out of the final conference documents," said Smita Narula, Senior Researcher at Human Rights Watch. "We have achieved a real victory by forcing a debate here in Durban on the daily discrimination faced by 250 million Dalits around the world." 

    Human Rights Watch criticized the media focus on the dispute over the Middle East, which accentuated after the walk-out of the United States and Israel. 

    "This meeting has been about so much more than the Middle East," said Brody. "It has been about refugees, about health, about racism in the application of the death penalty, about the unique ways racism and sexism interact, about repairing the legacy of slavery and colonialism, about the rights of indigenous peoples."


    Press Release, September 3, 2001

    Anti-Racism Summit Needs Concrete Results


    Press Release, August 27, 2001

    Racism & Human Rights


    Campaign Document, April 29, 2004



    African American Profile Graphics SoulCityGraphics.com
    Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
    hitupmyspot.com

     

    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH IN UNITED STATES
     
    http://www.humanrightswatch.org/doc/?t=usa&c=usdom 


    Human Rights Watch Amicus Brief in the Case of Baze v. Rees
    Argument to the Supreme Court on the Issue of Lethal Injections in the US
    Human Rights Watch filed an amicus brief in the lethal injection case of Baze v. Rees that is now before the Supreme Court. We argue that the Court should interpret the Eighth amendment to meet the human rights requirement that states with the death penalty must choose the method of execution that has the least risk of inflicting pain and suffering on the condemned. Such consideration must take into account a clear examination of current lethal injection protocol.
    November 16, 2007    Amicus Briefs
    Printer friendly version

    “No Safe Haven: Accountabilty for Human Rights Violators in the
    Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law hearing
    Human Rights Watch appreciates the invitation to submit a statement for the record on this important subject. On December 6, 2006, the US Department of Justice took an unprecedented step to ensure accountability for human rights violators who are in or come to the United States. The department brought the first-ever criminal charges for torture committed abroad. The charges are against Charles “Chuckie” Taylor, Jr., the son of the former Liberian president Charles Taylor and also a US citizen, who entered the United States in March 2006. The charges relate to Taylor, Jr.’s role in committing torture as head of a security unit under his father’s presidency in Liberia.
    November 14, 2007    Testimony
    Printer friendly version

    Letter in Support of the "American Anti-Torture Act of 2007" to Members of the US House of Representatives
    Human Rights Watch urges all members of the House to act quickly to pass the “American Anti-Torture Act of 2007,” H.R. 4114, which requires all US interrogators to abide by the same rules already in place for the military. The refusal of the newly-confirmed Attorney General Michael Mukasey to declare waterboarding illegal is cause for concern. If the attorney general will not place categorical limits on what is – and is not – permitted for use by interrogators, then Congress must.
    November 13, 2007    Letter
    Printer friendly version

    Just Another Day in a Guantanamo Courtroom
    Published in The Huffington Post
    When Omar Khadr, the 21-year-old Canadian walked into the Guantanamo courtroom escorted by three military police on Thursday he seemed calm. His boyish but bearded face was free of obvious emotion. This, after all, was the third time that the Pentagon has tried to bring charges against him in the Guantanamo-based military commissions.
    November 9, 2007    Commentary
    Printer friendly version

    US: Guantanamo Judge Allows Military Commissions to Proceed in Khadr Case
    A military judge today allowed the controversial military commissions at Guantanamo Bay to go forward without hearing evidence as to whether or not Omar Khadr, a 21-year-old Canadian who has been in US custody for more than five years, met the definition of an “unlawful enemy combatant” as required by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Human Rights Watch said today.
    November 8, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    Is There a Humane Way to Put Someone to Death?
    The Supreme Court Prepares to Examine Lethal Injections in the United States
    By Sarah Tofte
    Published in The Huffington Post
    There was a time when public debate about the death penalty in the United States focused on concerns about racial discrimination, lack of competent counsel for indigent defendants, and executing the innocent. But with the Supreme Court set to hear oral arguments early next year on whether lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment, the death penalty debate has shifted to how we put the condemned to death.
    November 7, 2007    Commentary
    Printer friendly version

    Canada: Protect Citizens Facing Death Penalty in US
    The Canadian government should not abandon its longstanding policy of seeking to prevent the execution of Canadian citizens in the United States, Human Rights Watch said today.
    November 7, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    Human Rights Watch Testimony Regarding Proposed Revisions to the Prison Litigation Reform Act
    Human Rights Watch submitted testimony to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security and the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties regarding its concerns about several misguided provisions in the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996. These provisons provide a significant barrier to the ability of US prisoners to protect their rights while incarcerated, and must be reformed.
    November 7, 2007    Testimony
    Printer friendly version

    The Pentagon Tries a New Tactic to Spin Guantanamo Coverage: Keep Journalists Away from NGOs
    Published in The Huffington Post
    The Pentagon, seemingly all too aware of what a debacle its military commissions have been, has come with a new tactic to prevent groups like mine, Human Rights Watch, from doing our jobs as watchdogs: Restrict our access to the press and handpick a new crop of observers.
    November 7, 2007    Commentary
    Printer friendly version

    US: Will the Next Attorney General Allow Torture?
    Michael Mukasey, President Bush's nominee for attorney general, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee for confirmation hearings in mid-October. On November 6, the commitee voted in favor of his nomination despite concerns about his stance on torture. Human Rights Watch still opposes Mukasey’s nomination and calls on the Senate to reject him unless he denounces waterboarding and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment as illegal.
    November 6, 2007    Campaign Document
    Printer friendly version

    US: Makeshift Military Commissions Rules Unfair
    Trial of Canadian Youth Should Be Transferred to Federal Court
    Ad hoc US military commission rules for the trial of Omar Ahmed Khadr, the 21-year-old Canadian who was been detained at Guantanamo since he was 15, are grossly unfair, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch called for Khadr’s trial to be moved to federal court.
    November 5, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    Mother of Dead Marine, Rep. Jim Moran, Nobel Laureate Jody Williams Urge Congress to Ban Cluster Bombs
    Global Day of Action Highlights Harm to Civilians
    Congress should pass legislation to protect civilians from the deadly effects of cluster munitions, Congressman Jim Moran, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Jody Williams and Lynn Bradach, mother of a Marine killed by a US cluster submunition in Iraq, said today.
    November 2, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    The Mukasey Nomination Should Hinge on More than Water-Boarding
    by Kenneth Roth, executive director
    Published in The Huffington Post
    Michael Mukasey's confirmation as attorney general next week appears to hinge on his refusal to state that water-boarding -- mock execution by drowning -- is torture. But the focus on water-boarding has obscured a critical issue. If the aim is to stop abusive interrogation, a more important question that senators should ask before the vote is whether Mukasey will insist that the Bush administration abide by the parallel prohibition of "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment."
    November 2, 2007    Commentary
    Printer friendly version

    US: Senate Should Reject Mukasey Nomination
    Refusal to Denounce Waterboarding Shows Him Unfit for Attorney General
    The United States Senate should reject Michael Mukasey’s appointment as attorney general because of his unwillingness to state that “waterboarding” and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment is illegal, Human Rights Watch said today.
    October 31, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    US: Rights Groups Raise Concerns About Mukasey Nomination
    Letter to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee
    Human Rights Watch and six other rights groups wrote a letter, which was hand-delivered to every member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, expressing concerns about Judge Mukasey’s responses to senators’ questions on the issue of torture and the president’s obligation to obey the law. The groups asked the senators to withhold judgment on the Mukasey nomination until he clarifies his views on these issues in writing.
    October 23, 2007    Letter
    Printer friendly version

    Human Rights Watch Urges Federal Bureau of Prisons Not to Re-Institute Broad Ban of Religious Books
    Letter to Harley Lappin, Director of the US Federal Bureau of Prisons
    Earlier this year, the Federal Bureau of Prisons removed a large portion of religious materials from prison chapel libraries, limiting the number of approved texts and books to 150 per denomination. The removal of these texts, and the opaque process by which the 150 texts that were left on the 'approved' list, generated a substantial public outcry, forcing the BOP to return the texts to the libraries. The BOP has, however, stated that after a comprehensive examination of chapel libraries in the federal prison system, it may institute a similar policy and once again remove a portion of religious texts that are made available to inmates. Human Rights Watch urges the BOP not to renew this policy, which violates the rights of prisoners.
    October 19, 2007    Letter
    Printer friendly version

    Brief of Amici Curiae Submitted to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Human Rights Watch and Partner Organizations Submit Brief Detailing Rights Violations Committed by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
    In an Amici Curiae Brief filed in the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Human Rights Watch and a number of other organizations provide profiles of individual cases that illustrate the unconstitutional nature of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) detention scheme. These detentions can last months or years, and often result in a detainee being placed in an ICE facility thousands of miles away from their families and communities.
    October 19, 2007    Amicus Briefs
    Printer friendly version

    US: Mukasey Mischaracterizes US Obligations on Torture
    Refuses to Rule Out Waterboarding
    Attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey mischaracterized US obligations on torture, wrongly suggesting that so-called “unlawful combatants” in US custody are not entitled to the humane treatment protections of the Geneva Conventions, Human Rights Watch said today. This view has been squarely rejected by the Supreme Court and should be disavowed by Mukasey as well.
    October 18, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    US: Mukasey Mischaracterizes US Obligations on Torture
    Refuses to Rule Out Waterboarding
    Attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey mischaracterized US obligations on torture, wrongly suggesting that so-called “unlawful combatants” in US custody are not entitled to the humane treatment protections of the Geneva Conventions, Human Rights Watch said today. This view has been squarely rejected by the Supreme Court and should be disavowed by Mukasey as well.
    October 18, 2007    Press Release
    Printer friendly version

    The Next Attorney General Must Renounce Torture
    Published in The Huffington Post
    When Michael B. Mukasey, the man President George W. Bush has tapped to be the next US Attorney General, appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, senators need to ask him a very simple question: Will he or will he not prohibit torture? Before the Senate confirms him for that position, it must secure a commitment from Mukasey that he will enforce the laws prohibiting torture.
    October 16, 2007    Commentary
    Printer friendly version
     
    African American Profile Graphics SoulCityGraphics.com
    Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
    hitupmyspot.com