(New York, September 10, 2001) -- Human Rights Watch said today that the key to ensuring that the World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) marked a step forward was ensuring that governments delivered on the anti-racism agenda adopted here.
The WCAR often seemed dominated by acrimonious disputes over the Middle East, including a walk-out by the United States and Israel. But Human Rights Watch said that on many other issues, including the protection of migrants and refugees, repairing the legacy of slavery and equal nationality rights for women, critical progress was made. The United Nations will appoint a panel of five experts to review how countries carry out their commitments.HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ON RACISM
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2001/09/10/global3038_txt.htm Press Release, September 3, 2001 Press Release, August 27, 2001 Campaign Document, April 29, 2004
Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
The World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, was held in Durban, South Africa from August 31 to September 7, 2001.
Berlin, April 28-29, 2004
Overview of Developments in 2001
from the Human Rights Watch 2002 World Report, January 16, 2002
Anti-Racism Summit Ends on Hopeful Note, Press release, September 10, 2001
India: Spotlight on Caste Discrimination, Press release, September 11, 2001
Overview:
Key issues:
Recent Press releases
Statements by Human Rights Watch to the Inter-Sessional Working Group for the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance
French Version
March 2001
Human Rights Watch World Report 2001 "Racial Discrimination and related Intolerance"
French Version
December 2000
Statement by Human Rights Watch to the First Preparatory Committee
May 1-5, 2000HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
Anti-Racism Summit Ends on Hopeful Note
Progress Amid Controversy; Dalits Vow to Fight On
Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
Argument to the Supreme Court on the Issue of Lethal Injections in the US
Human Rights Watch filed an amicus brief in the lethal injection case of Baze v. Rees that is now before the Supreme Court. We argue that the Court should interpret the Eighth amendment to meet the human rights requirement that states with the death penalty must choose the method of execution that has the least risk of inflicting pain and suffering on the condemned. Such consideration must take into account a clear examination of current lethal injection protocol.
November 16, 2007 Amicus Briefs
Printer friendly version
“No Safe Haven: Accountabilty for Human Rights Violators in the
Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law hearing
Human Rights Watch appreciates the invitation to submit a statement for the record on this important subject. On December 6, 2006, the US Department of Justice took an unprecedented step to ensure accountability for human rights violators who are in or come to the United States. The department brought the first-ever criminal charges for torture committed abroad. The charges are against Charles “Chuckie” Taylor, Jr., the son of the former Liberian president Charles Taylor and also a US citizen, who entered the United States in March 2006. The charges relate to Taylor, Jr.’s role in committing torture as head of a security unit under his father’s presidency in Liberia.
November 14, 2007 Testimony
Printer friendly version
Letter in Support of the "American Anti-Torture Act of 2007" to Members of the US House of Representatives
Human Rights Watch urges all members of the House to act quickly to pass the “American Anti-Torture Act of 2007,” H.R. 4114, which requires all US interrogators to abide by the same rules already in place for the military. The refusal of the newly-confirmed Attorney General Michael Mukasey to declare waterboarding illegal is cause for concern. If the attorney general will not place categorical limits on what is – and is not – permitted for use by interrogators, then Congress must.
November 13, 2007 Letter
Printer friendly version
Just Another Day in a Guantanamo Courtroom
Published in The Huffington Post
When Omar Khadr, the 21-year-old Canadian walked into the Guantanamo courtroom escorted by three military police on Thursday he seemed calm. His boyish but bearded face was free of obvious emotion. This, after all, was the third time that the Pentagon has tried to bring charges against him in the Guantanamo-based military commissions.
November 9, 2007 Commentary
Printer friendly version
US: Guantanamo Judge Allows Military Commissions to Proceed in Khadr Case
A military judge today allowed the controversial military commissions at Guantanamo Bay to go forward without hearing evidence as to whether or not Omar Khadr, a 21-year-old Canadian who has been in US custody for more than five years, met the definition of an “unlawful enemy combatant” as required by the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Human Rights Watch said today.
November 8, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
Is There a Humane Way to Put Someone to Death?
The Supreme Court Prepares to Examine Lethal Injections in the United States
By Sarah Tofte
Published in The Huffington Post
There was a time when public debate about the death penalty in the United States focused on concerns about racial discrimination, lack of competent counsel for indigent defendants, and executing the innocent. But with the Supreme Court set to hear oral arguments early next year on whether lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment, the death penalty debate has shifted to how we put the condemned to death.
November 7, 2007 Commentary
Printer friendly version
Canada: Protect Citizens Facing Death Penalty in US
The Canadian government should not abandon its longstanding policy of seeking to prevent the execution of Canadian citizens in the United States, Human Rights Watch said today.
November 7, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
Human Rights Watch Testimony Regarding Proposed Revisions to the Prison Litigation Reform Act
Human Rights Watch submitted testimony to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security and the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties regarding its concerns about several misguided provisions in the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996. These provisons provide a significant barrier to the ability of US prisoners to protect their rights while incarcerated, and must be reformed.
November 7, 2007 Testimony
Printer friendly version
The Pentagon Tries a New Tactic to Spin Guantanamo Coverage: Keep Journalists Away from NGOs
Published in The Huffington Post
The Pentagon, seemingly all too aware of what a debacle its military commissions have been, has come with a new tactic to prevent groups like mine, Human Rights Watch, from doing our jobs as watchdogs: Restrict our access to the press and handpick a new crop of observers.
November 7, 2007 Commentary
Printer friendly version
US: Will the Next Attorney General Allow Torture?
Michael Mukasey, President Bush's nominee for attorney general, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee for confirmation hearings in mid-October. On November 6, the commitee voted in favor of his nomination despite concerns about his stance on torture. Human Rights Watch still opposes Mukasey’s nomination and calls on the Senate to reject him unless he denounces waterboarding and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment as illegal.
November 6, 2007 Campaign Document
Printer friendly version
US: Makeshift Military Commissions Rules Unfair
Trial of Canadian Youth Should Be Transferred to Federal Court
Ad hoc US military commission rules for the trial of Omar Ahmed Khadr, the 21-year-old Canadian who was been detained at Guantanamo since he was 15, are grossly unfair, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch called for Khadr’s trial to be moved to federal court.
November 5, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
Mother of Dead Marine, Rep. Jim Moran, Nobel Laureate Jody Williams Urge Congress to Ban Cluster Bombs
Global Day of Action Highlights Harm to Civilians
Congress should pass legislation to protect civilians from the deadly effects of cluster munitions, Congressman Jim Moran, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Jody Williams and Lynn Bradach, mother of a Marine killed by a US cluster submunition in Iraq, said today.
November 2, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
The Mukasey Nomination Should Hinge on More than Water-Boarding
by Kenneth Roth, executive director
Published in The Huffington Post
Michael Mukasey's confirmation as attorney general next week appears to hinge on his refusal to state that water-boarding -- mock execution by drowning -- is torture. But the focus on water-boarding has obscured a critical issue. If the aim is to stop abusive interrogation, a more important question that senators should ask before the vote is whether Mukasey will insist that the Bush administration abide by the parallel prohibition of "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment."
November 2, 2007 Commentary
Printer friendly version
US: Senate Should Reject Mukasey Nomination
Refusal to Denounce Waterboarding Shows Him Unfit for Attorney General
The United States Senate should reject Michael Mukasey’s appointment as attorney general because of his unwillingness to state that “waterboarding” and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment is illegal, Human Rights Watch said today.
October 31, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
US: Rights Groups Raise Concerns About Mukasey Nomination
Letter to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Human Rights Watch and six other rights groups wrote a letter, which was hand-delivered to every member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, expressing concerns about Judge Mukasey’s responses to senators’ questions on the issue of torture and the president’s obligation to obey the law. The groups asked the senators to withhold judgment on the Mukasey nomination until he clarifies his views on these issues in writing.
October 23, 2007 Letter
Printer friendly version
Human Rights Watch Urges Federal Bureau of Prisons Not to Re-Institute Broad Ban of Religious Books
Letter to Harley Lappin, Director of the US Federal Bureau of Prisons
Earlier this year, the Federal Bureau of Prisons removed a large portion of religious materials from prison chapel libraries, limiting the number of approved texts and books to 150 per denomination. The removal of these texts, and the opaque process by which the 150 texts that were left on the 'approved' list, generated a substantial public outcry, forcing the BOP to return the texts to the libraries. The BOP has, however, stated that after a comprehensive examination of chapel libraries in the federal prison system, it may institute a similar policy and once again remove a portion of religious texts that are made available to inmates. Human Rights Watch urges the BOP not to renew this policy, which violates the rights of prisoners.
October 19, 2007 Letter
Printer friendly version
Brief of Amici Curiae Submitted to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Human Rights Watch and Partner Organizations Submit Brief Detailing Rights Violations Committed by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
In an Amici Curiae Brief filed in the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Human Rights Watch and a number of other organizations provide profiles of individual cases that illustrate the unconstitutional nature of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) detention scheme. These detentions can last months or years, and often result in a detainee being placed in an ICE facility thousands of miles away from their families and communities.
October 19, 2007 Amicus Briefs
Printer friendly version
US: Mukasey Mischaracterizes US Obligations on Torture
Refuses to Rule Out Waterboarding
Attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey mischaracterized US obligations on torture, wrongly suggesting that so-called “unlawful combatants” in US custody are not entitled to the humane treatment protections of the Geneva Conventions, Human Rights Watch said today. This view has been squarely rejected by the Supreme Court and should be disavowed by Mukasey as well.
October 18, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
US: Mukasey Mischaracterizes US Obligations on Torture
Refuses to Rule Out Waterboarding
Attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey mischaracterized US obligations on torture, wrongly suggesting that so-called “unlawful combatants” in US custody are not entitled to the humane treatment protections of the Geneva Conventions, Human Rights Watch said today. This view has been squarely rejected by the Supreme Court and should be disavowed by Mukasey as well.
October 18, 2007 Press Release
Printer friendly version
The Next Attorney General Must Renounce Torture
Published in The Huffington Post
When Michael B. Mukasey, the man President George W. Bush has tapped to be the next US Attorney General, appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, senators need to ask him a very simple question: Will he or will he not prohibit torture? Before the Senate confirms him for that position, it must secure a commitment from Mukasey that he will enforce the laws prohibiting torture.
October 16, 2007 Commentary
Printer friendly version

Profile Graphics - SoulCityGraphics.com
